add arrow-down arrow-left arrow-right arrow-up authorcheckmark clipboard combo comment delete discord dots drag-handle dropdown-arrow errorfacebook history inbox instagram issuelink lock markup-bbcode markup-html markup-pcpp markup-cyclingbuilder markup-plain-text markup-reddit menu pin radio-button save search settings share star-empty star-full star-half switch successtag twitch twitter user warningwattage weight youtube
  1. Blog

Parametric Part Lists

Recent Posts

December 2019

November 2019

April 2019

October 2018

September 2018

March 2018

February 2018

December 2017

November 2017

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017

December 2016

November 2016

October 2016

September 2016

August 2016

July 2016

June 2016

May 2016

April 2016

March 2016

February 2016

January 2016

November 2015

October 2015

September 2015

August 2015

July 2015

June 2015

May 2015

March 2015

February 2015

November 2014

October 2014

September 2014

August 2014

July 2014

June 2014

May 2014

April 2014

March 2014

February 2014

January 2014

December 2013

November 2013

October 2013

August 2013

July 2013

June 2013

May 2013

April 2013

March 2013

January 2013

December 2012

November 2012

October 2012

September 2012

August 2012

July 2012

April 2012

March 2012

philip

June 10, 2014

Last year we rolled out parametric price alerts which let you receive email notifications when any part in a user-defined set drops below a price threshold. Today we're significantly expanding that capability to part lists.

With parametric part lists, you can filter a part category and add it to your part list. Every time the part list is viewed, our pricing engine automatically identifies the lowest price compatible part from your criteria, while using your merchant preferences and tax settings. Since prices can change several times a day, parametric part lists allow you to always view the lowest price part matching the filter criteria you set.

Take choosing RAM for example. If you only want DDR3-1600 1.5V RAM from Corsair or G.Skill, just select those filters on the RAM category page, then click the "Add From Filter" button in the Parametric box (in the filters, top-right part of the page). Your part list will then automatically pick the lowest price RAM matching that filter criteria.

Alternatively, if you want to add a case to your build, but do not want to pick from filter criteria, you can select models on a part by part basis. In the category views are checkboxes that let you select which parts you want to evaluate. On selecting parts, the parametric add button switches to "Add From Selection". If you add the selection to your part list, it will evaluate the lowest price part from that set of parts. (We also threw in the ability to compare parts with the selection as well!)

Here is an example part list that uses both parametric filter and selection criteria.

We hope you enjoy this feature and find it useful! It's been a long time in the making, and we're excited to finally roll it out for everyone to use. Let us know what you think!

Log in to rate comments or to post a comment.

Comments

  • 69 months ago
  • 14 points

This is truly the perfect addition to an already amazing website! This makes the idea of lowest possible price much easier. Saves a lot of time!

  • 69 months ago
  • 8 points

It took me a minute to figure out, but now I realize that this is probably one of the most useful features introduced to PCPartpicker. Thanks again guys, for the excellent work

  • 69 months ago
  • 5 points

i love having the ability to compare a wide range of parts without having to cycle through pages. kudos to the site dev team for such a brilliant update!

  • 69 months ago
  • 5 points

This is what we all need. Everyone on this earth needs a panametric part list. Life wouldn't be complete without one.

  • 69 months ago
  • 3 points

Wonderful design but I was wondering if you could add a way to blacklist components. Like reverse what the check marks do. It would be nice to prevent lackluster components from showing up.

  • 65 months ago
  • 1 point

Try filtering with 4 stars. Unchecking 5 star parts helpfully removes parts that only have a single review.

  • 69 months ago
  • 3 points

Wow, that's a pretty fantastic feature. :) Only limitation I can see - currently for categories like Storage and RAM, the lowest price for a filter is not always the best value. Is there any chance that at some point in the future we could see parametric lists that pick parts by other criteria (e.g. lowest Price/GB)?

  • 69 months ago
  • 2 points

Thanks so much for this.

Just a question, how does this work with the compatibility filter?

Like right now i have a a10 apu in my system build, and when i select motherboards, then filter mini itx, i of course only see fm2 motherboards. but when i add to filter for lets say $70, in my parametric price alerts it shows for any mini itx mobo.

  • 69 months ago
  • 4 points

Ahhh, right. So when you add a parametric price alert, it is independent of your current part list. So in that regard we don't take compatibility into play. The compatibility is only accounted for when adding it to your part list. For price alerts, you'll want to set additional filter criteria to match the FM2 motherboards. However, I can understand how that's not quite as comprehensive as what you want - I'll have to think about that a bit more to see if we need to make it an option to limit price alerts compatible with a given part list.

  • 69 months ago
  • 2 points

I love how in touch you are with the users of your site. This is exactly what i do every build i make a build here. Search for RAM, sort by price, add. This will save me tons of time. With improvements and updates like this PCPP will stay the top and best place to build a computer on the internet.

Good job Philip and team.

  • 69 months ago
  • 1 point

It is the only place (as I know of).

  • 68 months ago
  • 2 points

This is a super awesome great addition,however for RAM and storage I usually filter by price/gb. For now iv'e worked around it by heavily filtering,and it's going great

  • 35 months ago
  • 2 points

Could you possibly include the search bar in the top right of the part selection page as one of the parameters in your parametric algorithm? I notice I'm still able to use logical operators in the search bar, so having that along with the parametrics you guys implemented would be an incredibly powerful addition to the already incredibly powerful tool you guys have given to us!!!

Please upvote this!!!

  • 69 months ago
  • 1 point

This is great! Very helpful addition to the site!

  • 69 months ago
  • 1 point

Beautiful. Thanks for the feature! This will be especially useful for RAM, SSDs, and some video cards.

  • 69 months ago
  • 1 point

This is perfect for everything but Graphics Cards. There is no way to filter based on whether or not the card has a reference-design cooler.

  • 69 months ago
  • 6 points

I can look into adding that.

  • 69 months ago
  • 1 point

Great update guys ! Keep it up !

  • 69 months ago
  • 1 point

Love it,Love it, LOVE IT! i just saved 200 dollars on my youtube gaming build! link: http://pcpartpicker.com/user/supermike560/saved/fwmLrH

  • 69 months ago
  • 1 point

Ah, I've been hoping that you folks would implement something like this for ages. I had no idea it was in the works. Now I can actually make static lists based on general price ranges that automatically select the best options available at the time.

Question: Does this save you on server side processing? I'm guessing the queries would go a lot faster because the machine knows exactly what it's looking for, for each part list (and nothing goes out to display during this process); which is a lot more efficient than a human picking things out... but that depends on the polling interval, which leads me to:

Question 2: Does this "choosing the best price" happen at intervals on the server side or every time the part list is loaded?

  • 69 months ago
  • 1 point

Tried using it for a bit. Another important question: are you going to add an option to sort it by best $/gig ratio? Because that's very important. You can easily choose capacity ranges in the filter, so it's easy to limit the price ceiling, and you know what you're looking for. But you're not always looking for simply the cheapest within that. A good example of this is SSD's. https://pcpartpicker.com/parts/internal-hard-drive/#t=0&m=12,21,32,33,34&S=120000,256000&sort=a6

I want what's at the top of this sort, not simply the lowest priced option, which will obviously just be the lowest capacity SSD.

  • 69 months ago
  • 1 point

Awesome. Thanks.

  • 69 months ago
  • 1 point

you guys need to make more budget builds maybe even have a cheapest gaming pc contest example: must be able to play games at 30+ fps no freebies

  • 69 months ago
  • 1 point

For your next update, I think that you should add laptop support. Macintosh support would be lovely (personally, I am a Mac kind of guy) too. I know that certain parts won't work with OSX (AMD for example), so maybe at the start of the build, you must choose an OS (Windows, OSX, Linux, or other ((The "Other" option would use the same parts as Windows and Linux))). Then only parts compatible with that OS will be shown. Great update, very helpful, and I hope to see my recommendations integrated into the site!

  • 69 months ago
  • 1 point

Best site ever! Another great addition to an already great site.

  • 68 months ago
  • 1 point

I actually would've never thought of this, but now that it's implemented, I'm actually really enjoying it. It's really useful when I'm trying to keep costs low :D.

  • 68 months ago
  • 1 point

I just found this site yesterday. Prior to that I've spent hours looking through sites for a good deal on high-quality ram. Found some candidates in less than 10 minutes here. Suggestions: RAM: Need the actual timing, not just the CAS latency. Not as a selection, but once I've narrowed the field down to the CAS latency I want, I'd like to compare the timing. Most are the same, but not all. CASE: Special features, for example top or front hot swappable SATA port, USB 3.0, front mic and speaker connections. CASE: Number of fan mounting points, as a selection factor. CASE: External and TOTAL drives as opposed to external and internal as you have it now. Selection on total drives should include externals. After all, if I need 6 internal drives, I don't care if one or two of them are external. On the other hand, if I need 1 external and 6 total, that would allow selection of a case with 2 external and 4 internal. CASE: The selection of number of drives is a minimum, yes? I'd hate to have a great case rejected from the list just because it had one more bay than I specified.

Thanks! Keep up the good work!

  • 66 months ago
  • 1 point

ooooooooooooh..... okay. I get it. Cool.

  • 65 months ago
  • 1 point

Hi only just started using this site (found it a while back but thought it was US market only) Great site and the filter functions are fantastic! Well done guys :)

  • 38 months ago
  • 1 point

So, I tried the "add from filter" button and it gave me no results and then there were no motherboards listed even with no filters. Any help would be grateful

  • 35 months ago
  • 1 point

simply put at least one filter in then

  • 34 months ago
  • 1 point

Parametric lists don't help me. I want to be able to buy all of the parts I am buying, not just the cheapest.

  • 34 months ago
  • 1 point

Ok? Not sure how that's related to parametric lists - and it's not what they were intended to solve?

  • 15 months ago
  • 1 point

It would be nice to be able to edit the parametric filter.

  • 69 months ago
  • 0 points

Does anyone else think this warrants a forum for users to post their filter sets for critique and advice?

  • 69 months ago
  • -3 points

http://pcpartpicker.com/p/XjFZzy how is this please tell me suggestions my first pc if i dicide to go through

  • 69 months ago
  • 5 points

I'd recommend trying our part list opinions wanted forum.

  • 69 months ago
  • 2 points

thanks i did

  • 66 months ago
  • 1 point

That all depends on budget/use/and monitor resolution. I use a 1920*1080 42" LCD T.V. as a monitor.

[comment deleted by staff]
[comment deleted]

Sort

add arrow-down arrow-left arrow-right arrow-up authorcheckmark clipboard combo comment delete discord dots drag-handle dropdown-arrow errorfacebook history inbox instagram issuelink lock markup-bbcode markup-html markup-pcpp markup-cyclingbuilder markup-plain-text markup-reddit menu pin radio-button save search settings share star-empty star-full star-half switch successtag twitch twitter user warningwattage weight youtube

0 0

0 0